While the Missouri legislature is in session (January - May), the PSRS/PEERS Board of Trustees and staff closely monitor any proposed legislation regarding retirement and education. We work with Missouri education associations and other Missouri retirement
systems to ensure the best interests of our members are served.
Proposed Legislation Could Have Negative Impact on PSRS/PEERS Investments
On Thursday, April 17, Senate Bill (SB) 672 was amended in the Missouri House General Laws Committee to include several provisions, which could negatively impact the Public School and Education Employee Retirement Systems of Missouri (PSRS/PEERS). Section 105.690 of Missouri law currently requires all public pension plans (including PSRS/PEERS) to give preference to a Missouri-based company when they hire or invest funds in a venture capital firm, a consultant or a fiduciary. The current process allows the Board to have the flexibility to invest in the best investment programs without being limited.
The new provisions found in the House Committee Substitute (HCS) of SB 672 require that all public pension plans in Missouri, including PSRS/PEERS, invest 2% to 5% of their assets in a venture capital firm that is organized or incorporated in Missouri or has its principal place of business in Missouri. It also requires that PSRS/PEERS give preference to the selection of a consultant or investment fiduciary that is organized or incorporated in Missouri or has its principal place of business in Missouri.
This investment mandate would require PSRS/PEERS to invest between $730 million to $1.8 billion in a venture capital firm that is organized in Missouri. That is a large mandate for a relatively small venture capital investment market. For example, in 2013, $29.4 billion was invested in venture capital across the nation. However, the entire venture capital industry invested just $74.1 million in Missouri in 2013 and only $21.5 million in 2012. Therefore, Missouri represented only 0.25% of the total venture capital activity in the nation.
On April 18, 2014, State Treasurer Clint Zweifel, who serves on the Missouri State Employees Retirement Systems (MOSERS) Board of Trustees, sent a letter to the General Assembly urging them to not support this public pension investment mandate and to keep politics out of public pension plan investing.
In 2002, PSRS/PEERS' investment staff completed an in-depth report on Missouri venture capital investing. The report was updated in April 2014, and indicates that an in-state directed venture capital program would result in higher investment risk for the Systems with much lower investment returns than a diversified venture capital program.
Based on PSRS/PEERS research, this provision will result in investment returns significantly less than a diversified, national investment strategy. The fiscal impact to PSRS/PEERS is estimated at $73 million to $182 million per year in reduced investment revenue. It is also important to note that the investment fees associated with these types of investments could result in an additional $14 million to $35 million in fees per year. As such, the total estimated annual cost to PSRS/PEERS, should this provision be adopted, could be between $87 million to $217 million per year. This cost would ultimately result in an increase in the contribution rates of our members and employers.
The provision that was added to Missouri statute 105.690 in SB 672 is a mandate on the Systems that would diminish and impair the Board's full authority in directing the Systems' investment program. The PSRS/PEERS Board of Trustees has set policies for the investment program that are specifically tailored (in terms of risk, expected return and preserving the ability to pay future benefits) to the specific needs of PSRS/PEERS.
This mandate is contrary to prudent investment policy and the Board's fiduciary responsibility as well as the Board's Protection of the Missouri's Educators Retirement Fund Resolution. The Board is opposed to any bill that would limit, diminish or impair its authority to direct the Systems' investment program and is opposed to any mandate that would restrict its ability as fiduciaries of the Systems.